Legal Opinion
In Re National Student Marketing Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided January 29, 1973No. MDL No. 2941PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman.
The Panel having found, upon the basis of the papers submitted and the hearing held, that the actions listed on the attached Schedules A and B involve common questions of fact and that transfer of these actions to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and would further the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,
It is ordered that all actions on the attached Schedule A pending in districts other than the District of Columbia be, and the same hereby are,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Library Editions of Children's BooksUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lipsig v. National Student Marketing Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- Mildred Lipsig v. National Student Marketing Corporation Louis W. Biegler and Biegler Foundation v. Pomerantz, Haudek, Levy & Block, a Partnership (Three Cases). Louis Garber v. Cortes W. Randell Domenick L. Natale v. National Student Marketing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Petrofunds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.