Legal Opinion

Amazi v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1991No. 90-627PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This appeal involves an indemnification dispute. The parties involved were both defendants in two underlying suits. Appellant and Cross-Defendant Grant-Norpac (GN) appeals the order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting summary judgment to the Respondent and Cross-Claimant Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) on its cross-claim for indemnification in the underlying lawsuits. We affirm.

GN raises a sole issue on appeal:

Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment to ARCO on its cross-claim for indemnification, including indemnification for ARCO’s own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cereck v. Albertson's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Frigon v. Morrison-Maierle, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sweet v. Colborn School Supply, Burlington Northern Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chase v. Bearpaw Ranch Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. James Constructors, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. PENNANT SERVICE CO., INC. v. True Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. A.M. Welles, Inc. v. Montana Materials, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Montana Rail Link v. Cusa Prts., LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API