Legal Opinion

Moll v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1916No. Appeal, No. 31PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 31, Oct.- T., 1916, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 218, in equity, overruling demurrer to bill in equity in case of Charles G. Moll v. Eustace S. Morrow, Controller of the City of Pittsburgh, and Arthur G. Burgoyne, Jr. Bill in equity to enjoin the city controller of the City of Pittsburgh from approving and countersigning warrants for salary and expenses of Arthur G. Burgoyne, Jr., Superintendent of the.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 31, Oct.- T., 1916, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 218, in equity, overruling demurrer to bill in equity in case of Charles G. Moll v. Eustace S. Morrow, Controller of the City of Pittsburgh, and Arthur G. Burgoyne, Jr. Bill in equity to enjoin the city controller of the City of Pittsburgh from approving and countersigning warrants for salary and expenses of Arthur G. Burgoyne, Jr., Superintendent of the. Bureau of Public Morals in the Department of Public Safety, and to enjoin him from performing any duty or municipal function as…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This decree is affirmed, at appellants’ costs, on the opinion of the court below, overruling the demurrer to the bill of complaint.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Stewart v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Walnut & Quince Street Corp. v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. WoodringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Weatherly Borough v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API