Legal Opinion

Harington v. Ignacio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2004No. 03-17347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

David A. Harington appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

We may not grant a petitioner habeas relief unless he has demonstrated that the state court adjudication on the merits was contrary to or an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as enunciated by the United States Supreme Court, or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 70—71, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1172, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Volpi v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Harington v. Budge, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API