Legal Opinion

Markovits v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 31, 1952No. Docket Nos. 28885, 28886, 29112, 29113, 29737, 29738, 30191, 30195, 30563, 30564Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Markovits, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.

Markovits v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 28885, 28886, 29112, 29113, 29737, 29738, 30191, 30195, 30563, 30564.

United States Tax Court

1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 126; 11 T.C.M. (CCH) 823; T.C.M. (RIA) 52245;

July 31, 1952

Clyde C. Sherwood, Esq., 703 Market St., San Francisco, Calif., for the petitioners. R. G. Harless, Esq., for the respondent.

HARRON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

HARRON, Judge: The respondent has determined deficiencies in income tax and negligence penalties as follows:

Docket

5% Penalty

Petitioner

No.

Year

Deficiency

Sec. 293 (a)

Michael…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. O'Meara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API