Legal Opinion

President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit by Smith against The Terre Haute and Richmond Railroad Company, to recover for stock killed by tbe machinery of the road, in 1858. The suit was commenced in tbe Common Pleas, and the complaint did not allege negligence, but simply that tbe road was not fenced.

A demurrer to tbe answer reached back to tbe complaint.

Tbe cases of The Jeffersonville, etc., v. Martin, 10 Ind. 416; The Indianapolis, etc., v. Taffe, 11 Id. 458; and Indianapolis, etc., v. Kercheval, 16 Id. 84, are decisive that tbe action can not be maintained.

Tbe objections that there was a want of jurisdiction, and of a cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jeffersonville Railroad v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. BruceyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Phillips v. KlepferIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API