Legal Opinion

Keesling v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1983No. 62PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.

This case involves the two dismissals provision of Md. Rule 541.1 The plaintiff in this action, Elza L. Keesling (Keesling), appealed from a summary judgment entered against him by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in favor of the State of Maryland (the State). That judgment was premised on a determination that in each of two, separate, prior lawsuits Keesling had voluntarily dismissed the State within the meaning of Rule 541 c, so that there had been an adjudication on the merits in favor of the State. Because the second "dismissal” was not a voluntary one, we shall reverse.

*724Keesling…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Washburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  2. Keesling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Landay v. CohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Shapiro v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Peninsula Produce Exchange v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pharmaceia Eni Diagnostics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Jarman v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API