Legal Opinion

Amah Mbacham Innocent v. Warden, Imperial Regional Adult Detention Facility, et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 18, 2026No. 3:26-cv-04815Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAH MBACHAM INNOCENT, Case No.: 26-cv-4815-RSH-BJW 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. ALTER JUDGMENT 14 WARDEN, Imperial Regional Adult [ECF No. 11] Detention Facility, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to alter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 59(e). ECF No. 11. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the 20 motion. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 On August 24, 2026, petitioner Amah Mbacham Innocent, proceeding pro se, filed 23 a petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Jody Kaufmann v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API