Legal Opinion

Claim of Kerchik v. La Fontaine Novelty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

At the time of claimant’s accident, while at work in a hat factory, she was fifteen years of age. She had been working for twelve dollars a week. Taking into consideration the fact that under normal conditions her wages would be expected to increase, the State Industrial Board has determined her average weekly wages to be .twenty-five dollars a week. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 14, subd. 5.) There is no evidence to justify that finding. The only employee who received twenty-five dollars a week was a man, who ran a picking machine and it had always been a man’s job to run that machine.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Szmuda v. Percy Kent Bag Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Claim of Lerner v. Jakwall Embroidery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Foyt v. DaiglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Claim of Meszaros v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API