Legal Opinion

Beavers v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1968No. 4758PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Beavers sued Appellee Taylor to declare a $5,000. note fully paid, and to recover damages for alleged usurious interest collected by appellee. Appellee denied usury, and cross-acted for judgment on the $5,000. note.

Trial before the court without a jury, and upon a “Stipulation of Facts”, resulted in judgment for appellee for $5,000. on her cross-action, and denial of all relief sought by appellant.

Appellant appeals on 5 points, contending the trial court erred in entering judgment for appellee on the note, and in not holding the transaction usurious.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C. C. Slaughter Co. v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Pansy Oil Co. v. Federal Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Hatridge v. Home Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Korth v. TumlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Griffin v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. The Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp., Etc., and First Gibraltar Bank, Fsb, Intervenor-Appellee v. Jack GriffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Haskell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Armando Fong Najarro and Compania Financiera Libano, S.A. v. Sasi International, Ltd., and Suzanne FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. First USA Management, Inc. v. EsmondTexas Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API