Legal Opinion

Reese v. Resburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term. Action by Jacob B. Eeese and another against Edward W. Besburgh (or Bisbrough) and others. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $16,-402.51, money had and received, belonging to the plaintiffs’ late firm of Eeese, Williamson & Co., of which the plaintiffs, together with the defendant Besburgh, were the surviving partners, and which was collected by the defendant De Zavala from the collector of the port of New York under the following circumstances: Prior to-1874 the firm of Eeese, Williamson & Co. were merchants and importers doing business in the city of New York. At this time the late Chester A. Arthur was the collector of the port of New York, and under his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Moseley v. . MoseleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Best v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Dodge v. SchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Masters v. De ZavalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API