De Garcia v. Empire Fasteners, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, the defendant Empire Fasteners, Inc. (hereinafter Empire), submitted photographs establishing that its property did not abut the por*711tion of the sidewalk which contained the alleged defect that the plaintiff identified at her deposition as the location of her fall. Empire thus established that it did not have a duty to maintain the portion of the sidewalk where the plaintiff fell in a reasonably safe condition, and that it was therefore entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Vikhor v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montalbano v. 136 W. 80 St. CPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Camacho v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Byron v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Camacho v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Harrison v. 4919 Church, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016