Legal Opinion

Sprung v. Coutin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1986No. 85 Civ. 5780 (WCC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

Plaintiff Arnold Sprung (“Sprung”) brought this action against his former wife, Michele Coutin (“Coutin”), seeking a declaratory judgment that he is no longer obligated to pay her alimony under a separation agreement between them. Sprung also seeks to recover alimony payments he made to Coutin from 1978 through the end of 1984, when he stopped making payments. Coutin in turn has counterclaimed for those payments Sprung has refused to make from January 1, 1985 to date, plus attorney’s fees. The Court’s subject matter jurisdiction is predicated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Nichols v. NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Bliss v. BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Northrup v. NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Leffler v. LefflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API