Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Harris

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 13, 1983No. SPCM 17338Published

1ConcurrenceForeman, Judge

I concur. While Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), prohibits any further attempts to interrogate a suspect who has invoked his right to counsel, Edwards did not contemplate that a suspect would deliberately mislead the police by concealing his earlier request for counsel. Furthermore, Edwards does not prohibit all further conversations with a suspect on collateral or administrative matters. Nor does it prohibit asking a suspect whether he has been advised of his rights or requested counsel. See United States v. Goodson, 14 M.J. 542, 544 — 45 (A.C.M.R.),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. GoodsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API