Jefferson County Board of Education v. Fell ex rel. L.F.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentVenters, J.
For the reasons expressed herein, I dissent. The Majority labors at great length to explain how a statute, so plain and obvious on its face, is actually a riddle that only lawyers and school administrators can understand. I respectfully submit that the sentence: “Within the appropriate school district attendance area, parents or legal guardians shall be permitted to enroll their children in the public school nearest their home” plainly and without ambiguity means that parents are entitled to send their children to be educated in the school located nearest to their residence.
I. THE MAJORITY…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.