Legal Opinion

Collins v. Martzell, Thomas & Bickford

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1991No. 89-3830PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

The district court divided a contingent fee between two attorneys, doing so on a quantum meruit basis, awarding John R. Martzell and his law firm of Martzell, Thomas & Bickford, 85% of the fee and Charles L. Collins the remaining 15%. Collins appealed; Martzell cross-appealed. For the reasons assigned, we affirm.

Background

The instant attorney fee dispute arose out of the effort by Cheryl Fusselman to recover damages for the death of her husband in a maritime accident. Mrs. Fussel-man was referred to Collins by their common pastor. At that time Collins was working as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Defrancesch v. HardinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Fontenot & Mitchell v. ROZAS, MANUEL, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Seal v. Pipeline, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In The Matter Of P & E Boat Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API