Legal Opinion

Barker v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1950No. 31355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This representative action was instituted by appellants against respondents to procure a decree requiring delivery of water to their lands for irrigation purposes, in such a manner that the lands might be beneficially irrigated, and to declare certain rules, adopted by the Sun-nyside Valley Irrigation District for water deliveries, invalid. The court sustained the rules and dismissed the action.

The background of this case will be found in Caruthers v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District, 29 Wn. (2d) 530, 188 P. (2d) 136. In that case the history of the Sunnyside irrigation project and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Lawrence v. SouthardWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Donahoe v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Caruthers v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Wenatchee Reclamation District v. TitchenalWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neubert v. Yakima-Tieton Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. Ahtanum Irr. Dist.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API