Legal Opinion

In Re Disposable Diaper Patent Validity Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 21, 1973No. 136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

This patent litigation consists of three actions in two different districts concerning the validity and enforceability of the Proctor and Gamble (hereinafter P&G) patent on disposable paper diapers. Both U. S. Industries, Inc. (hereinafter U.S.I.) and Weyerhaeuser Company manufacture and sell disposable paper diapers which P&G has alleged infringes its patent. Weyerhaeuser moves the Panel for an order transferring all actions to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. U.S.I. favors transfer only to the Southern District of New York; P&G opposes…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Arising From the Air Crash DisasterUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Brandywine Associates Antitrust & Mortgage Foreclosure LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  2. In Re Bourns Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  3. In Re Panty Hose Seaming Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  4. In re Shipley Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  5. In re Mt. Vernon, Illinois, Times Square Shopping Center Contract Dispute LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API