Legal Opinion · Dissent

Levingston v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 5, 1983No. 05-81-01059-CRPublished

1DissentWhitham, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In my view the trial court committed reversible error in allowing the prosecutor to comment on ap*327pellant’s failure to call a probation officer as a witness. Accordingly, I would sustain appellant’s second ground of error and reverse and remand.

During final argument at the punishment phase of trial the prosecutor made the following remark:

MS. JEROME [Prosecutor]: ... You heard defense counsel ask him when he was on the stand, if he had an interview with a probation office [sic] and ask yourself, if he was worthy of that probation, where is the probation officer to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'BRYAN v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Kerns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Schulz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Winkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API