Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Shook

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 18, 2003No. SC 84509Published

1Opinion of the Court

100 S.W.3d 786 (2003)

Glen L. HANCOCK, Appellant,

v.

William and Ruth SHOOK, d/b/a Barnes Feed Store, Respondents.

No. SC 84509.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

March 18, 2003.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 2003.

Mr. Timothy E. Gammon, Springfield, for Appellant.

JoAnne S. Jackson, Michele Craycroft, John Housely, Springfield, for Respondents.

PRICE, J.

I

Glen Hancock appeals a verdict in his favor of $12,500 against William and Ruth Shook, doing business as Barnes Feed Store. Mr. Hancock's dairy herd ingested feed purchased from the Shooks that was contaminated with a toxic mold. Mr. Hancock sought…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Chrysler Corporation v. John J. Carey Joseph P. Danis Carey & Danis, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API