Kille, Sr. (David) v. Cox

their maximum term and not to the minimum term. Appellant asserted that as applied to him, the 2007 amendments to NRS 209.4465 constitute an ex post facto violation because he was convicted in 2003. Appellant's claim was without merit. "[T]he ex post facto prohibition . forbids the imposition of punishment more severe than the punishment assigned by law when the act to be punished occurred." Weaver v. Graham,

450 U.S. 24, 30

(1981) (italics omitted); see also Stevens v. Warden, Nev. State Prison, 114 Nev. 1217, 1222,

969 P.2d 945, 948

(1998) (discussing that computation of good-time credits on…