Legal Opinion
MacClelland v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 2022No. 3:21-cv-08592Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERESA MACCLELLAND, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08592-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY 10 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, et al., PROCEEDINGS, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR 11 Defendants. LEAVE TO FILE NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE TO CUSTOMER 12 AGREEMENT 13 Docket Nos. 20, 43 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiffs, individually, as private attorneys general, and on behalf of a putative class of 17 other customers similarly situated, allege that Defendants Cellco Partnership d/b/a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.