Legal Opinion

Staley v. Nazarenus

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 7, 1929No. 12,406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubice

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. We hereinafter refer to them thus, or as “Staley,” “Startzell,’’ and ‘‘Nazarenus.’’ One Walter Hoops, automobile dealer of Greeley, Colorado, operated under the name of “Greeley Motor Sales.” He is hereinafter referred to as “Hoops.”

Hoops sold Nazarenas an automobile, and in part payment took an installment note secured by a mortgage on the car. Five days later this paper was transferred to plaintiffs. Shortly thereafter Nazarenus, dissatisfied with the automobile and claiming misrepresentation, returned it. Some kind of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Continental Nat. Bank v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Rogers v. FunkhouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Dottavio v. LohrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Cold Spring Tungsten, Inc. v. American Steel & Iron Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Gandrud v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API