Legal Opinion
Adame v. North Mountain Foothills Apartments LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 14, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00664Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Artemio Adame, No. CV-25-00664-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 North Mountain Foothills Apartments LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Artemio Adame alleges he was not paid the overtime wages he was owed 16 while working for defendant North Mountain Foothills Apartment (“NMFA”). Adame’s 17 complaint asserts a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) claim and an Arizona Wage Act 18 (“AWA”) claim. Those claims are asserted against NMFA and its owners, Michel Gareau 19 and Carrie Matteson (collectively,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Hydro Investors, Inc. v. Trafalgar Power Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cohen v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Geter v. Galardi South Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Ader v. Simonmed Imaging Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.