Maher v. Bull
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding. The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence
On the 16th of April, 1860, Cadwallader Bull, of Buffalo, now deceased, and whose wife, as his administratrix, is the appellee herein, entered into a partnership in the coal business with Maher & Kelly of Chicago, who were then engaged in that trade. By the articles of copartnership, Bull was to furnish coal from Buffalo; Maher was to provide a coal yard, fixtures, and carts, and Kelly was to give the business his personal attention and supervision. The expenses of the business were to be divided equally between the parties, except the salary of the book-keeper, which was to be paid by Bull.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Orr v. BoockholdtAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Randle v. RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Inglis v. FloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889