Legal Opinion
State v. Hancock
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1998No. 28230PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*162OPINION
By the Court, Rose, J.:
On March 3, 1994, a criminal complaint was filed charging the respondents with racketeering and securities fraud. An indictment was filed on February 9, 1995. Respondents moved to dismiss the indictment on a number of grounds. The district court granted the motion to dismiss, stating that the indictment was not pled with specificity. The State contends that the indictment was pled with sufficient specificity to put the respondents on notice of the charges pending against them. The State further contends that because the filing of an amended indictment would not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Simpson v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Brimmage v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephen Comstock v. Stefanie HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Grant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Lakeman (Ronald) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HancockNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor (Terrell) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019