Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Matthew Larson Trust Agreement

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2013No. 20120319Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMaring, Justice

[¶ 31] I concur in those parts of the majority opinion that set forth the correct law to be applied for reformation of trusts, and I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the trial court misapplied the law using contract law to determine the Clair-monts did not meet the statutory requirements for reformation of the trusts under N.D.C.C. § 59-12-15. I, however, dissent *399from the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s findings of fact support our Court ordering reformation. I am of the opinion that the trial court did not make sufficient findings for this Court to apply the correct law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Agnes M. Gassmann Revocable Living Trust v. ReichertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API