In Re John D. CONRY

hi join in the majority’s opinion permanently disbarring respondent, but I write separately to note that I find respondent’s pattern of intentional and flagrant misconduct to be particularly outrageous.

Respondent’s repeated acts of professional misconduct, as set forth in the per curiam, cannot be considered a mistake or omission. The hearing committee found that respondent engaged in multiple instances of conversion (an intentional act), and the disciplinary board determined that respondent knowingly and intentionally violated duties owed to his clients, the public, the legal system, and the…