Legal Opinion

In Re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 2, 2010No. MDL No. 2143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in two Northern District of California actions {CMP Consulting and AT) seek centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the five actions listed on Schedule A in the Northern District of California. This litigation consists of four actions pending in the Northern District of California and an action pending in the Central District of California. 1 All responding parties support the motion.

After considering the argument of counsel, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API