State v. Dillard
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Franldin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The defendants were indicted for a riot. The indictment charges that the defendants, on, &c., with force and arms, did unlawfully, riotously, &c., assemble and gather themselves together to disturb the peace of the state, and, being so assembled, did then and there make a great noise, disturbance, riot, and tumult, and then and there unlawfully, riotously, &cl, remained and continued together making such noise, riot, tumult, and disturbance, for the space, &c., and then and there fought through and with each other, &c. Plea, not guilty, and verdict against the defendants. Motion in arrest of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Carmody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. AcraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kiphart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873