Legal Opinion

Brecht v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*791The matters requested are not reports and records required by statute to be made and filed and, therefore, do not come within section 66-a of the Public Officers Law (Matter of Erenberg v. Brill, 10 A D 2d 769). Discovery and inspection of the first three items mentioned may not be had under section 324 of the Civil Practice Act (Briant v. New York City Tr. Auth., 7 A D 2d 756; Faendrick v. Allied Aviation Serv. Int. Corp., 284 App. Div. 898; Ehrlich v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 251 App. Div. 721; Falco v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 161 App. Div. 735). Nor may there be discovery and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Ehrlich v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Faendrick v. Allied Aviation Service International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API