Legal Opinion

Kimes v. Charlie's Family Dining & Donut Shop

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1988No. 88-063PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Claimant Mr. Kimes received disability benefits for a work-related injury to his knee until he entered a settlement agreement with the insurer, Pacific Employers Insurance Company (Pacific). Pacific appeals the ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Court which set aside the settlement. Mr. Kimes cross appeals the discontinuation of his temporary total disability benefits. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Did the lower court err in setting aside the full and final settlement agreement on the grounds of mutual mistake of fact?

2. Did the lower court err by failing to continue temporary total disability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kienas v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Weldele v. Medley DevelopmentMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sollie v. Peavey Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WebbMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gamble v. SearsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. South v. Transportation InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harrison v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kruzich v. Old Republic InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API