Salcedo v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary and he appeals.
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion in limine, thereby allowing the State to present evidence of an alleged rape in Florida of which appellant was acquitted in a jury trial.
The indictment in the instant case alleged that appellant committed the offense of burglary with intent to commit rape. The victim in this case, Jan Martin, testified that she awoke about 6:00 a.m. and saw the dim image of a man, later identified as appellant, coming through her bedroom doorway. Appellant walked to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Felker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Rosenthal v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salcedo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Salcedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Salcedo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989