Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 6, 1985No. 84-685Published

1ConcurrenceDaniel S. Pearson, Judge

Although I agree with the majority’s decision to remand this case for a new trial, I think it worth noting that we are rejecting the alternative proposed by the State that we first remand the case for a hearing, wherein the trial court will apply the test announced in State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984),1 to determine whether the peremptory challenges exercised by the State were, in fact, exercised in a discriminatory manner. Simply because this alternative was neither proposed nor addressed in Neil or subsequent Florida cases, see, e.g., Andrews v. State, 459 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1984); City…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Land v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. City of Miami v. CornettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API