Miller v. Dallas County
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBond, Chief Justice
I dissent from the view of the majority, sustaining appellants’ “Point One” (as they designate their complaint), that the trial court erred in rendering judgment for Dallas County, non obstante veredicto. The question involved is of such importance to the public welfare that it behooves this court to give, more in detail, the facts and circumstances revealed by the record-. The assignment presents a question of law. Rodriguez v. W. O. W. Life Ins. Soc., 136 Tex. 43, 145 S.W.2d 1077.
The language employed by Judge Looney in the former appeal involving this cause (Miller v. Dallas County,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lamar County v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BoykinTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- State of Texas v. Travis CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Worsham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Commissioners' Court of Harris County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.