Legal Opinion

Long v. Ozmint

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action 6:07-3495-HFF-WMCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HENRY F. FLOYD, District Judge.

This case was filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. Petitioner is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that the petition be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondents to file a return. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Breyan v. StateDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  2. Long v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API