Wilfred A. Brown v. State of Florida

Wilfred Brown appeals his convictions for grand theft and fraudulent security transaction. He argues that his convictions violate double jeopardy, and that the trial court erred in imposing supplemental costs of prosecution without _ holding a hearing. We hold that the convictions do not violate double jeopardy, but he is entitled to a hearing on the supplemental costs of prosecution.

Appellant was charged with two counts: (1) grand theft, in violation of sections 812.014(l)(a)-(b) and 812.014(2)(a)l., Florida Statutes ■ (2007); and (2) a fraudulent security transaction, in violation of…