Legal Opinion

Palm Beach Dermatology v. Mikan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 2006No. 1D05-0956Published

1Per curiam

The employer/carrier appeals an order awarding permanent total disability *672(PTD) benefits to the claimant, appellee. We reverse. The record shows that the claimant has not reached actual maximum medical improvement (MMI). Where a claimant has not reached MMI by the expiration of the temporary benefit period and has presented no competent substantial evidence that she will be totally disabled when she does reach MMI, any claim for PTD benefits is premature. Olmo v. Rehabcare Starmed/SRS, 930 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). In this case, the claimant has not provided any competent substantial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olmo v. Rehabcare Starmed/SRSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API