Legal Opinion

Becker v. East Asiatic Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 29, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the language of section 289 of the Civil Practice Act is sufficiently broad to permit the examination before trial of a party by examining a corporate managing agent thereof through a designated officer of the latter. The question, although raised, was not decided in Blasius v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. (187 App. Div. 347), but in Henriques v. Gauthiod Marine Ins. Co., Ltd. (205 id. 8), the same court (Appellate Division, First Department) upheld service of a summons on a corporate defendant where the summons had been delivered to the treasurer *569of another corporation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Appleby v. Insurance Office of Australia, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Blasius v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Becker v. East Asiatic Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API