Mitchell v. PEMCO Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
¶1 Norm Mitchell is the representative in this class-action suit against his employer, PEMCO Mutual *728Insurance Company. Mitchell alleged that the three categories of claims adjusters in the class were improperly classified as administrative employees exempt from overtime pay. PEMCO conceded that one type of adjuster was not exempt, and the court found that the other adjusters— casualty and property adjusters—in the class were properly classified as exempt. Because substantial evidence supports the court’s finding that casualty and property adjusters are exempt, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Mitchell…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of ChelanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fiore v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Rhett Greenfield, V. Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023