Legal Opinion
Weikert v. Logue
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 11, 1970No. 44875PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff, Mary Elizabeth Logue, individually and doing business as Lenox Personnel; seeks $1,450 as compensation for services performed in obtaining employment for the defendant, Phillip H. Weikert, with the Burroughs Corporation, basing her claim on the arranging of an interview and a referral after the defendant had signed a writing captioned “Contract with Lenox Personnel” which states that Lenox Personnel is licensed, bonded, and operated under Georgia law, and regulated by a division of the State Labor Department, and which provides that “If I accept a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheffield v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Spence Drug Co. v. American Soda Fountain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Gettier-Montanye Inc. v. Davidson C. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Gettier-Montanye Inc. v. Davidson Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Silver v. Crescent Hat Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jonesboro Tool & Die Corp. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- EnduraCare Therapy Management, Inc. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Cardin v. Outdoor East, a Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Contractors Equipment Co. v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976