Legal Opinion

Naso v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided March 31, 2010No. 18830-08SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CARL D. AND CAROL NASO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Naso v. Comm'r

No. 18830-08S

United States Tax Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2010-39; 2010 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 39;

March 31, 2010, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Carl D. and Carol Naso, Pro sese.

Alicia E. Elliott, for respondent.

Ruwe, Robert P.

Ruwe, Robert P.

RUWE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 1 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. Pursuant to section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Armentrout v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  5. Petty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API