Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 8, 2006No. 1:02cr376PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELLIS, District Judge.
Noe David Ramirez, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to extend the time for filing a petition to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. It appears from the motion that Ramirez (hereinafter “movant”) believes the one-year statute of limitations for filing his § 2255 petition expires November 14, 2006, and because he asserts that he has not completed his petition, he seeks an extension of time. He also requests appointment of counsel to aid him in preparation of his petition.
Movant was tried in the Eastern District of Virginia and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Donald Green, Also Known as Sly, Also Known as Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Luis G. LeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Denis Rivera, A/K/A Conejo, United States of America v. Noe David Ramirez-Guardado, A/K/A TrickyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Azeezudin v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- Booth v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Edwards v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.