Legal Opinion

Township of Manalapan v. Loeb

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 11, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, J. S. C.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The complaint is for a declaratory judgment whether plaintiff is authorized to pay for legal services incurred by defendants arising out of an indictment.

Defendant Loeb was at all relevant times and still is a committeeman of Manalapan; defendant Brandt was at the time of the alleged criminal acts the mayor of the township, and defendant Sweitzer was at the time of the alleged criminal acts the township business administrator.

On or about September 12, 1972 the grand jury in Monmouth County handed up an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. City of Del Rio v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Lowe v. City of Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Schieffelin v. HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bowling v. BrownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. CondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Manalapan Tp. v. LoebNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API