Legal Opinion

Attwood Brass Works v. Aero-Motive Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1960No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 48,150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Plaintiff sued in assumpsit for work done and material furnished. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proofs, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and, upon appeal thereof in 1956 this Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings (347 Mich 693). In January of 1959, after completion of defendant’s proofs and plaintiff’s rebuttal evidence, the trial court again entered judgment of no cause against the plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s declaration alleged defendant’s indebtedness to it for work done and material furnished on tools and machine parts; attached copies of invoices and a statement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harden v. WidovichMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Attwood Brass Works v. Aero-Motive Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Kelly v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API