Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ware v. Byrd

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2021No. 110865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. Byrd,

2021-Ohio-4432.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO EX REL., KIMANI E. WARE, : Relator, : No. 110865 v. : NAILAH K. BYRD, ET AL., : Respondents. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED DATED: December 13, 2021 Writ of Mandamus Motion Nos. 550364 and 550687 Order No. 550839 Appearances: Kimani E. Ware, pro se. Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Samuel T. O’Leary, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent. ANITA LASTER MAYS, P.J.: Relator, Kimani E. Ware, seeks a writ…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Hall v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Ware v. Giavasis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Byrd (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Neguse v. McIntosh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Ware v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API