BODIFORD v. WALTZ Et Al.

McFadden, Presiding Judge.

In this action seeking to enforce an alleged oral agreement conveying an interest in land, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding, among other things, that such an oral agreement is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. Because the trial court correctly found that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.

1. Facts and procedural posture.

"Summary judgment is warranted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is…