Legal Opinion

Marinhagen v. Boster, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 30, 1992No. 66,718PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bukaty, J.:

Plaintiffs Everett Marinhagen and Shirley Marinhagen appeal from the summary judgment entered against them and in favor of defendants Boster, Inc., Charles D. Boster, and Nita Boster.

We first consider the issue of whether plaintiffs filed the appeal out of time, thus depriving us of jurisdiction.

On March 12, 1991, the summary judgment order from which this appeal is taken was entered and served on counsel by mail in compliance with K.S.A. 60-258 and Rule 134 (1991 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 112). The Marinhagens’ notice of appeal was filed more than 30 calendar days thereafter, on May 30,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. De Medina v. ReinhardtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  4. Pilcher v. Board of Wyandotte County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. Henrickson v. DrottsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ortega v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Foster v. AlliedSignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Kastner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  5. Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API