Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Leeds v. Maine Crushed Rock & Gravel Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 8, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

Action of debt by tax collector of the town of Leeds to collect a tax assessed on personal property described as “machinery” and employed by the defendant, a Maine corporation located at and with its principal place of business at Portland, in its gravel and sand pit in the town of Leeds. Case comes up on exceptions to the ruling of the presiding justice that the action could not be maintained.

It is admitted that the usual statutory requirements for assessing a tax and bringing a suit were complied with. The only question is, was the property taxable in Leeds.

*53The “machinery” included these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Commonwealth v. John T. Dyer Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Commonwealth v. Welsh Mountain Mining & Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Wellington v. Inhabitants of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. People ex rel. Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. SaxeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. Wertheimer Bag Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Schumacher Stone Co. v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pride's Corner Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Westbrook Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API