State Ex Rel. Koalska v. Rigg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Petitioner, whose appeal from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is now pending, moves this court for a subpoena to secure the production of the stenographic record made of the proceedings in the district court and for the production of the exhibits introduced in such proceedings.
Petitioner’s motion is denied in its entirety since a subpoena will not be issued by this court for a futile and useless purpose. Any exhibits used in the proceedings before the district court will be available upon appeal by following the usual routine procedure and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DahlgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958